Find the Mistake

Take ten seconds and see if you can find the mistake in the item below. If you can’t find it, click ‘continue reading’ below for the answer.

Continue reading

Posted in Bizarre But Real, Humor, Weird Photo, WTF? | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Just Plain Weird Pix

No politics here — just a compilation of weird photos found on the Innertubes.

1. You have to wonder what she was thinking when she got dressed:

2. Hasn’t this happened to all of us? Well, no, actually…

3. Was the editor on vacation, or was it a good laugh around the shop?

4. This ‘pepper-spraying cop’ sweater, the creation of artist Abbie Heppe, was a hot item last Christmas, I’ve heard:

5. Finally, what cats look like underneath when they’re sitting ‘all tucked in’:

Posted in Bizarre But Real, Humor, Weird Photo, WTF? | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Cartoon: How Mitt Romney Was Hired at Bain

Posted in 1 Percent, 2012 Election, 99 Percent, Cartoon, Christopublicans, Collagatorial, Conservatives, Corporations, Corruption, Economy, Humor, Idiots, Republicans, Wall Street | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Speaking of Great Wealth…

There continues to be a question barely touched on in the so-called ‘national debate’ about the wealth of Mitt Romney and the other top 1 percent: what did they do that is worth the money they made?  Romney ‘created’ (inadvertently) a few thousand mainly low-wage jobs — is that worth his $250 million US in assets today and the $45 million he receives annually for not working at all?  (BTW, since he also outsourced or eliminated thousands of American jobs, his record as a ‘job creator’ is a wash at best.)  I don’t care if someone gets rich for actually doing something — whether it’s writing a best-selling book, playing a sport, or inventing a useful product — but Romney and most of the top 1 percent didn’t accumulate wealth through their labor — they fundamentally just gamed the system and shuffled paper around, a demented system where you can get $45 million a year for NOT working.  (What’s wrong with that picture?)  

Inevitably, any consideration of wealth in America ends up talking about Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, still the richest person in the world according to Forbes.com, with wealth of $59 billion.  Unlike many, I have no hard stick against Gates or his Microsoft partner Paul Allen ($13.2 billion); I mean, how can you hate someone who became rich outsmarting IBM?   But the question remains: is what Gates and Allen did worth a total of $72.2 billion?   The various Windows platforms, as ‘buggy’ and frustrating as they sometimes were and are, have revolutionized personal communication and access to information, and are responsible for providing the bedrock for the free exchange of ideas on the Internet that led to uprisings against various authoritarian regimes across the globe, the blossoming of the ‘citizen journalist’ movement, and may ultimately even save democracy in this country.  While it may not be a cure for cancer, it’s a pretty incredible achievement for a couple of computer geeks, and I could say the same about competitors like the late Steve Jobs ($7 billion at the time of his death) and his Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak (net worth in 2011 a mere $100 million).  Leaving aside for now the internecine, ‘inside baseball’ battles in Geekdom over the relative importance and brilliance of the four computer icons mentioned, at least they worked and made a contribution to society; Romney, from what has been written about him, ran a leveraged-buyout company, Bain Capital, that essentially had no reason for existing; Bain would swoop down and buy up some firm, gut its assets and, if they couldn’t prop it up again, let it go bankrupt, but Bain always profited from upfront ‘fees’ even if the acquired company went bankrupt, even if Bain shareholders took a loss.  Romney made his millions from business practices that were illegal in this country at one time and should be again.  And, with his privileged background and prominent-politician father, it’s a lock that he would have ended up with a well-paid gig somewhere no matter what he did.  As Edgar Bronfman Sr, billionaire one-time head of Seagram’s Distilleries, once said, “To turn $100 into $110 is work. To turn 100 million into $110 million is inevitable,” and that’s what Mitt Romney did; he rolled his inherited advantages into riches, with winning the birth lottery his only real ‘work.’

Here are some interesting facts about Gates and his money, published in 2006:

Excerpt from “Facts About Microsoft’s CEO Bill Gates”

1. Bill Gates earns US$250 every SECOND, that’s about US$20 Million a DAY and US$7.8 Billion a YEAR!

2. If he drops a thousand dollars, he won’t even bother to pick it up because during the 4 seconds he picks it, he would’ve already earned it back.

3. The US national debt is about 5.62 trillion dollars, if Bill Gates were to pay the debt by himself; he will finish it in less than 10 years.

4. He can donate US$15 to everyone on earth but still be left with US$5 Million for his pocket money.

5. Michael Jordan is the highest paid athlete in US [in 2006]. If he doesn’t drink and eat, and keeps up his annual income i.e. US$30 Million, he’ll have to wait for 277 years to become as rich as Bill Gates is now.

6. If Bill Gates was a country, he would be the 37th richest country on earth.

7. If you change all of Bill Gate’s money to US$1 notes, you can make a road from the earth to moon, 14 times back and forth. But you have to make that road non-stop for 1,400 years, and use a total of 713 BOEING 747 planes to transport all the money.

8. Bill Gates is [55 in 2011] this year. If we assume that he will live for another 35 years, he has to spend US$6.78 Million per day to finish all his money before he goes to heaven.

9. If Microsoft Windows’ users can claim US$1 for every time their computers hang because of Microsoft Windows, Bill Gates will be bankrupt in 3 years.

Excerpt from the PBS documentary “Triumph of the Nerds”:

Posted in 1 Percent, 2012 Election, 99 Percent, Christopublicans, Conservatives, Corporations, Corruption, Idiots, Politics, Religion, Republicans, Video, Wall Street, WTF? | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Today’s Quotes: Wealth

“The international community . . . allows nearly 3 billion people—almost half of all humanity—to subsist on $2 or less a day in a world of unprecedented wealth.”
— Kofi Annan, former UN Sec’y-General, from an interview with Awake! Magazine, May 22, 2002

“We have no more right to consume happiness without producing it than to consume wealth without producing it.”
— George Bernard Shaw

“If the majority of people of a country, no matter how great its natural resources, organize and conspire to get more out and put less in, to do less and get more … how long can it last?”
— William J.H. Boetcker

“Nothing incites to money-crimes like great poverty or great wealth.”
— Mark Twain

“At the end, the acquisition of wealth is ignoble in the extreme.”
— Andrew Carnegie

“In truth, poverty is an anomaly to rich people. It is very difficult to make out why people who want dinner do not ring the bell.”
— Walter Bagehot in 1858.

“The hopes of the Republic cannot forever tolerate either undeserved poverty or self-serving wealth.”
– President Franklin Delano Roosevelt

“Few rich men own their property. The property owns them.”
— Robert Ingersoll, 1896.

“No rich man is a patriot, no rich man is a friend. They have all only got one fatherland—the Ritz-Carlton; and one friend—the mistress they’re promising to divorce their wives for.”
— Christina Stead, “House of All Nations,” Simon & Schuster (1938).

“There is enough for all. The earth is a generous mother; she will provide in plentiful abundance food for all her children if they will but cultivate her soil in justice and in peace.”
— Bourke Cockran

“If rich men would remember that shrouds have no pockets, they would, while living, share their wealth with their children, and give for the good of others, and so know the highest pleasure wealth can give.”
— Troy Edwards

“Poor men seek meat for their stomachs, rich men stomachs for their meat.”
— English Proverb

“Greed for wealth is an eternally empty stomach that can never be filled by any feast.”
— Thomas Scazin

“Saving is a very fine thing, especially when your parents have done it for you”
— Winston Churchill

“It is passing strange but true that if most wealthy Wall Street denizens were suddenly broke and reduced to begging in the streets, they’d try to find someone else to do the actual panhandling while they sat back and collected 10 or 15 percent of the proceeds for coming up with the idea.”
— Richard Sherricky

“If rich people could hire other people to die for them, the poor could make a wonderful living.”
– Yiddish Proverb

“Wealth doesn’t confer automatic happiness, whereas people who are not wealthy but very much want to be, believe it will confer almost automatic and unrelieved happiness. This is not true. Part of the reason is that to get the wealth you have to behave in a way that will definitely not make you happy. It’s a beautiful circularity.”
— Felix Dennis

“Though they suffer no restriction of choice, in reality even multi-millionaires soon reach the outer limits of purely personal gratification—which should be some satisfaction to the rest of us.”
— Alan Whicker

“Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal:
“But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal.
“For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.”
— Jesus, New Testament, Matthew 6:19–21

“Give no bounties: make equal laws: secure life and prosperity and you need not give alms.”
— Ralph Waldo Emerson, “Wealth.”

“Wealth is its own curse; from the moment of attainment to the last gasp of life, it is a chain on the leg that few are strong enough to break.”
— Margaret Haverwood

“Common sense among men of fortune is rare.”
— Juvenal, Satires, VIII. 73.

“Worldly wealth is the devil’s bait; and those whose minds feed upon riches recede, in general, from real happiness, in proportion as their stores increase.”
— Robert Burton

“The Rich aren’t like us -— they pay less taxes.”
– Peter De Vries

“We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both.”
— Louis Brandeis, U.S. Supreme Court Justice

Posted in 1 Percent, 99 Percent, Conservatives, Economy, Quotes, Republicans, Wall Street | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Paycheck President

Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum are traveling in the South Carolina countryside.  Weary, they stop at a small country inn.  “I only have two rooms, so one of you will have to sleep in the barn,” the innkeeper says.  Santorum volunteers to sleep in the barn, leaves, and the others go to bed.  In a short time they’re awakened by a knock. It’s Santorum:  “There’s a cow in that barn. I’m afraid of cows, so I can’t get to sleep.” Romney says that’s OK, he’ll sleep in the barn. The others go back to bed, but soon are awakened by another knock. It’s Romney:  “There’s a pig in that barn. I really love pigs and hate to see them restrained in any way, so I can’t get to sleep out there, either.”  So Newt Gingrich offers to go sleep in the barn with the cow and the pig.  After he leaves, the other two soon fall asleep, but they’re shortly awakened by a frantic banging on the door.  They open the door and the cow and pig charge into the house in panic, followed shortly by Gingrich, zipping up his pants.  Startled fully awake by the ruckus, Romney and Santorum demand Gingrich tell them what in hell happened out in the barn.  “For God’s sake,” replied Newt, “I was just trying to show them how I’d be their paycheck president!”

 

Posted in 1 Percent, 2012 Election, Conservatives, Humor, Idiots, Politics, Republicans, Wingnuts | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Today’s Quotes: Private Greed and Public Need

Posted in 1 Percent, 99 Percent, Conservatives, Corporations, Corruption, Economy, Fascism, OWS Movement, Quotes, Republicans, Teabaggers, Wall Street | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The GOP Master Debaters Updated

Posted in 1 Percent, 2012 Election, Christopublicans, Conservatives, Humor, Idiots, Politics, Republicans, Teabaggers, Wall Street, Wingnuts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Romney’s ‘Free Market Capitalism’ Myth

Mitt Romney, the blundering, dull, grown-up rich kid currently being beaten up by thrice-married ‘family values’ uber-hypocrite Newt Gingrich on the death march to the Republican nomination for president, apparently really thinks he made his fortune — or added to it, since Daddy left him a million bucks inheritance money — by dabbling in something he believes was the ‘free market.’ Of course, there is not now and never was any such thing; Romney’s firm Bain Capital gamed the system to make sure they alwaye profited from their leveraged-buyout corporate raiding schemes, even if Bain shareholders sometimes took a bath. The partners at Bain also helped themselves to a generous government-supplied 15 percent top tax rate, when the top rate for Romneyesque millionaires is supposed to be 35 percent. A sweet deal for Mitt, and it wasn’t due to the ‘free market.’

Incidentally, Romney keeps touting his magical job creating talents while with Bain, and points to the Staples office supply chain as a Bain property that provided middle-class jobs. Considering that the income for a U.S. middle-class family is about $45,000 a year, Mitt is talking straight through the seat of his pants. Most of the jobs at Staples are ‘Sales Associates’ (cashiers and floorwalkers) and ‘EasyTech’ personnel (that means they know how to use a copy machine and fiddle with a computer). Those jobs, according to Staples, pay thusly:

Staples pays EasyTech Associate average $8.90 per hour range from $7 to $12. Sales Associate Hourly Rate: $8.58/hr, from $7 to $10. For Sales Manager, yearly salary is $43,260 on average,range from $33k to $50k.
From Staples Employment and Careers.

That means the EasyTech employees, at the top end, earn no more than $24,960 a year. Sales Associates can only gross a maximum of $20,800 annually, and both of those figures are before taxes. These are not middle-class jobs, Mitt; they’re miserable live in fear of missing a paycheck, take crap from your boss, and work longer hours without overtime jobs.

At any rate, Joshua Holland at AlterNet does some nice work of slicing up Mitt’s ‘free market’ mythology:

Mitt Romney Wouldn’t Know a Free Market If It Bit Him on the Ass

At Bain Capital, Romney used the tax code to redistribute wealth from taxpayers to his investors and partners.

Joshua Holland
AlterNet.org
January 18, 2012

The lion’s share of the wealth Mitt Romney accumulated during his years at Bain Capital was extracted not only by laying off workers and raiding their pensions, but by using what conservatives call “big government” to redistribute wealth from taxpayers to Bain’s investors and partners.

Bain Capital was not in the business of creating jobs, or even saving companies over the long-term. Its model had a relatively low rate of success; a study by Deutche Bank found that 33 out of 68 major deals cut on Romney’s watch lost money for the firm’s investors. Its richest deals made up for the flops, however, and Bain’s partners were guaranteed hefty fees regardless of how the businesses they “restructured” ultimately performed.

Read the rest here.

Posted in 1 Percent, 2012 Election, Conservatives, Corporations, Corruption, Economy, Idiots, Politics, Republicans, Wall Street | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Sullivan May Be Right About ‘Sun Tzu’ Obama

I’m not Andrew Sullivan’s biggest fan, but he does have some interesting points to make regarding Obama’s ‘long game’ strategy. Despite Obama’s apparent weakness and indecisiveness at times, I remember when Obama was in state government in Illinois, long before the nation ever heard of him, and the ‘impossible’ things he accomplished, such as mandating police videotape confessions for capital crimes (to show it wasn’t beaten or coerced out of the suspect, a bill IL law enforcement was against); increased payments to women and children receiving state benefits (which various clout-heavy health care corporations strongly opposed); and eliminating gifts to state elected officials, which were used in lieu of cash bribes. (This last was very unpopular in Springfield and directly affected Rep. Emil Jones, Obama’s general assembly mentor.)  How did he get this done?  He played a slow ‘long game’ of softening up the opposition and making them think he was weak or indecisive or just a ‘go along to get along’ kind of guy, meanwhile observing their strengths and weaknessnesses and how best to motivate them to act on his policies.  Sun Tzu would have been proud of Obama’s approach in Illinois, and I’ve seen some of this while he’s been president — such as ending DADT and extending unemployment benefits by compromising on the Bush tax cuts for a short period — a period that is about to expire and the Republicans have no bargaining chips left with which to keep them.  Short-term, GOP wins; long-term they are losing. Obama’s a pragmatist and doesn’t waste his time on bills he knows won’t pass, such as universal health care, but he tries to lay the groundwork for expanding legislation, just as happened with Medicare and Medicaid 40 years ago.  In other words, ‘Obamacare,’ once accepted by the public, will make it easier to eventually transition to universal health care in the future.  As well as being a great orator — think of that speech on race relations in the 2008 campaign that stopped even Republicans dead in their tracks with its brilliance — he’s also a very smart man and he’s been lucky in the choice of tired-GOP-talking-point opponents he faces next November, none of whom are intellectually fit to shine his shoes.

Unfortunately, some of my progressive friends are impatient with this ‘long game’ strategy and can’t appreciate when it’s working.  They’re good people, but you wouldn’t want them commanding the troops in a political campaign; they’d announce to the enemy exactly what they plan to do and how they’re going to do it and give them time to mount an opposition. As Sun Tzu wrote: “Be extremely subtle, even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious, even to the point of soundlessness. Thereby you can be the director of the opponent’s fate.”  Obama has proven himself sufficiently subtle — the Republican Party is now on the ropes, for example, and even some of the Teabaggers are worried about reelection — but I hope he isn’t too subtle and restrained for the upcoming reelection fight.

Andrew Sullivan: How Obama’s Long Game Will Outsmart His Critics

Newsweek
Jan. 16, 2012

You hear it everywhere. Democrats are disappointed in the president. Independents have soured even more. Republicans have worked themselves up into an apocalyptic fervor. And, yes, this is not exactly unusual.

A president in the last year of his first term will always get attacked mercilessly by his partisan opponents, and also, often, by the feistier members of his base. And when unemployment is at remarkably high levels, and with the national debt setting records, the criticism will—and should be—even fiercer. But this time, with this president, something different has happened. It’s not that I don’t understand the critiques of Barack Obama from the enraged right and the demoralized left. It’s that I don’t even recognize their description of Obama’s first term in any way. The attacks from both the right and the left on the man and his policies aren’t out of bounds. They’re simply—empirically—wrong.

Read the rest here.

The Case Against Liberal Despair: Michelle Goldberg on Obama

Posted in 1 Percent, 2012 Election, 99 Percent, Christopublicans, Conservatives, Democrats, Health Care, Obama, Politics, Progressives, Republicans, Teabaggers, Wall Street | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment